Boerenlandvogels – WP

Auteur: Eric

  • Agrochemical Apocalypse: Interview with Environmental Campaigner Dr Rosemary Mason

    The renowned author and whistleblower Evaggelos Vallianatos describes British environmentalist and campaigner Dr Rosemary Mason as a “defender of the natural world and public health.” I first came across her work a few years ago. It was in the form of an open letter she had sent to an official about the devastating environmental and human health impacts of glyphosate-based weed killers. What had impressed me was the document she had sent to accompany the letter. It was over 20 pages long and contained official data and referred to a plethora of scientific papers to support the case she was making.

    For almost a decade, Rosemary Mason has been writing open letters and sending reports she has compiled to media outlets and prominent officials and agencies in the US, the UK and Europe to question their decisions and/or to inform them of the dangers of pesticides. She has been relentless in exposing conflicts of interest, fraudulent science and institutionalised corruption in regulatory processes surrounding glyphosate and other agrochemicals. Her quest has been fired by a passion to protect the natural world and the public but there is also a personal aspect: she is affected by a serious health condition which she attributes directly to the reckless use of pesticides in South Wales where she resides. And her assertion here is not based on idle speculation. In her reports, she has presented a great deal of evidence about the deterioration of the health of the British public and how agrochemicals play a major contributory role.

    She recently sent me a report ‘How glyphosate-based herbicides poisoned our nature reserve and the world‘. It focuses on how she had set up a nature reserve in South Wales. What she and her husband (who has a professional background in conservation and nature) had achieved on that reserve was impressive. But thanks to the local council’s indiscriminate spraying of glyphosate-based herbicides, it was subsequently transformed from a piece of land teeming with flora and fauna into a barren wasteland.

    What follows is an interview I conducted with Rosemary Mason about her nature reserve and her campaigning. We discussed her motivation, the support she has received and her feelings after almost a decade of campaigning.

    Colin Todhunter: Have you always had a passion for the natural environment?

    Rosemary Mason: I was born in the countryside during the war and my mother took us on walks and taught us about wildflowers, which was her passion. My brothers and I fished in the stream for minnows and sticklebacks and set nightlines for pike and chub (we never caught any). When I was a junior doctor, I became interested in bird watching and I am former chair of the West Area, Glamorgan Wildlife Trust. At that time, unlike today, farmland was full of lapwing, oystercatcher and redshank displaying and protecting their nests.

    CT: Why did you decide to set up your nature reserve?

    RM: In 2006, the Bumblebee Conservation Trust was launched in response to the massive declines in bumblebees, butterflies and insects in general, with the demise of traditional hedgerows, hay meadows, chalk grassland and wildflowers and the intensification of farming and the widening use of pesticides. At the same time, the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council perversely announced the closure of its wildlife research centres for ‘financial reasons’, a decision opposed by 99% of 1,327 stakeholders. Monks Wood centre, which hosted BBC’s Spring Watch, pioneered work on DDT and pesticides in the 1960s and more recently revealed how climate change is affecting wildlife, with spring arriving three weeks earlier. More significantly, the research centres were also involved in assessing the impacts of GM (genetically modified) crops on wildlife, with findings contradicting industry claims that no harm would be caused.

    In response, in March 2006, my husband and I decided to establish our own small pesticide-free wildlife reserve after attending a joint meeting of the Welsh Ornithological Society and the British Trust for Ornithology in Aberystwyth.

    CT: I have read your new report about your nature reserve. I would certainly encourage everyone to read it. It describes in some detail how you and your husband set about attracting an impressively wide array of bird, insect and plant species to the reserve, many of which had virtually disappeared from the British countryside, mainly as a result of intensive farming practices. What I found impressive is your knowledge of these species and how you were able to identify them. From the narrative provided (which at times reads almost like a novel) and the enthusiasm conveyed, you put in a lot of hard work developing the reserve and what you achieved there was impressive.

    RM: In brief, it was a miracle. I think the next five years from 2006 were the most exciting and fulfilling of my life. At the end of 2009, I wrote an account of speckled bush crickets. Judith Marshall, working at the Natural History Museum, is a world expert on grasshoppers and bush crickets. She said it was the first monograph to be written on a single species.

    CT: Can you say something about the demise of the nature reserve?

    RM: We published a second photo-journal in 2010, ‘The year of the bumblebee: observations in a small nature reserve.’ But in 2011, I knew something was wrong. The moths were disappearing from the area and the orb web spider had gone from the hedge. We were aware that the local council was spraying glyphosate-based herbicides on Japanese knotweed in the valley below and close to our reserve. But we had to be sure.

    So, in August 2013 and August 2014, we sent samples of river water and tap water to Leipzig to Prof Dr Monika Kreuger for analysis. Between August 2013 and August 2014, the levels of glyphosate in tap water had increased ten-fold, from 30 ppt to 300 ppt. These were of the order of concentrations that stimulated the growth of breast cancer cells in a laboratory setting.

    In August 2013, we asked our then Welsh Assembly Member to request the council to stop spraying glyphosate-based herbicides on Japanese knotweed. The council said they would only stop if they were authorised by the Health and Safety Executive. So, I wrote to the HSE at the beginning of 2014 telling them about measuring increasing glyphosate levels in water and that we had had many cases of breast cancer in our area. They refused to do it because they said that glyphosate-based herbicides were still legal. I begged them to do it on several occasions, as we saw the biodiversity in our reserve plummeting. Finally, they said if I asked the same question again, they wouldn’t reply to me.

    CT: You have engaged in a long struggle for many years, trying to get officials at local, national and European levels to act on pesticides. You have written many open letters to policy makers and key officials and have usually attached lengthy reports referring to data and scientific papers in support of your case. I think you began doing this in late 2010. Whose work have you taken inspiration from along the way?

    RM: The work of Dr Henk Tennekes, the independent Dutch toxicologist, was a real eye opener for me. In 2010, he published a paper and wrote a book ‘The Systemic Insecticides: a disaster in the making’. It is about the loss of insects and insect-feeding birds in Europe, caused by neonicotinoid insecticides. The RSPB and the IUCN Charities refused to help fund the book because it ‘wasn’t scientific enough’. We subsequently discovered that Syngenta had funded neonicotinoid seeds for the RSPB Hope Farm Reserve. Systemic neonicotinoid insecticides are still on the market in the UK and the US nine years later.

    I found Henk’s work to be shattering. It actually changed the course of my life. The fact was that he’d worked out that the effect on the brains of insects was irreversible, cumulative and there was no safe level of exposure. What was worse was that the Chemical Regulation Directorate didn’t seem to take it seriously. So, I wrote to Europe and the US EPA and the response was the same: ‘there is no evidence that the neonics are harmful to honeybees.’ Henk had written this book with amazing pictures and artwork showing the impact on insect-feeding birds throughout Europe. Humans had the same receptors; so, imagine the effects on humans if there are lots of neonics around. By March 2011, Henk and I decided that there would be a chemical apocalypse. So here we are, eight years later and bingo, our predictions were spot on!

    Francisco Sanchez-Bayo, a toxicologist living in Australia, wrote papers with Henk agreeing that neonicotinoids insecticides irreversibly damaged the brains of insects and that levels built up over time. In 2019, he wrote a paper with a colleague in China, which proved that insect losses were global and due to pesticides.

    Then there was the late Dr Maewan Ho of the former Institute of Science in Society who helped me to publish an article in the ISiS magazine in September 2014: ‘How Roundup poisoned my nature reserve’. She sadly died on 16 March 2016 from advanced cancer. She was an amazing woman and gave me much encouragement.

    Finally, Polly Higgins, a Scottish barrister and environmentalist, gave up her practice and set up an organisation to end ecocide (destruction of the environment). Polly Higgins was an inspiration and campaigned tirelessly against ecocide. She died from cancer aged 50.

    CT: Given all the open letters you have written to officials over the years, I cannot but feel you have by and large been stonewalled. Where does the buck stop?

    RM: With David Cameron, the Health and Safety Executive and Defra (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs) . A ‘Letter from America’ was sent from nearly 60 million US citizens warning Europe not to authorise GM crops and Roundup because of the disastrous effects on human health and biodiversity. Wales and Scotland took that advice. David Cameron received it on 11 November 2014, but he and Defra ignored it on behalf of England and kept it secret from the public. Cameron also appointed Michael Pragnell, Founder of Syngenta, to be Chairman of Cancer Research UK, which I’ve written about.

    The HSE refused to ask the Council to stop spraying GBH on our reserve because it was ‘still legal’. The European Commission and the European Food Safety Authority ignored the Letter from America too and kept on authorising GM crops for feed and food in the EU.

    Of course, there are many others who should be held responsible too, such as Bernhard Url, chief executive of EFSA, and the recently retired Chief Medical Officer for England, Dame Sally Davies.

    CT: How do you feel about the destruction of your reserve, the pesticides issue, the state of nature and those officials who have effectively ignored much of what you have said to them? Disappointed? Frustrated?

    RM: Those are such inadequate words to express my feelings. I am devastated about the global losses of biodiversity and I weep for our reserve. Sometimes, I dream that it is all reversible, but I know it is not. I read books about nature as ‘comfort food’. I feel sorry for the children who may never see a butterfly or a bumblebee. Indeed, I am a bit disappointed about the lack of support I have had from certain environmental groups and media outlets that report on environmental issues. I would like the mainstream media to acknowledge the role of the pesticides industry, but I don’t suppose they ever will.

    However, I have gained some satisfaction from receiving expressions of gratitude and praise via the academia.edu site where my work is archived. And at least Jon Snow (Channel 4 broadcast journalist in the UK) has revealed the chief cause of losses of biodiversity to be poisoning the land, not global warming.

    How do I feel? Maybe ‘resigned’ would be the right word to use.

    • All of Rosemary Mason’s work can be accessed on the academia.edu website .

    Source:
    Colin Todhunter in Dissident Voice / October 29th, 2019
    https://dissidentvoice.org/2019/10/agrochemical-apocalypse-interview-with-environmental-campaigner-dr-rosemary-mason/

  • Massale insectensterfte catastrofaal voor mens en dier

    Als er niets verandert, zijn binnen honderd jaar alle insecten uitgestorven. Dat heeft desastreuze gevolgen voor het ecosysteem. Daarvoor waarschuwen wetenschappers, zo schrijft The Guardian.

    De afgelopen 25 tot 30 jaar nam het aantal insecten jaarlijks met 2,5 procent af. Als het in dit tempo doorgaat is er binnen een eeuw geen levend insect meer te vinden. Dat blijkt uit een overzichtsstudie die in vakblad Biological Conservation verscheen. Oorzaken zijn volgens de wetenschappers de intensieve landbouw, verstedelijking, pesticiden en klimaatverandering.

    Er zijn meer studies die lokaal hebben aangetoond dat het aantal insecten snel afneemt. Zo is in Puerto Rico het aantal grondinsecten met 98 procent gedaald in de laatste 35 jaar. “Als we de manier waarop we voedsel produceren niet veranderen, zullen insecten ook wereldwijd binnen enkele tientallen jaren uitsterven”, schrijven de wetenschappers. “De gevolgen voor het ecosysteem van de planeet zullen catastrofaal zijn.”

    Insecten zijn veel belangrijker voor het leven op aarde dan je denkt. Ze bestuiven planten, recyclen voedingsstoffen en vormen het voedsel voor andere dieren. De overgrote meerderheid van de vogels, reptielen en amfibieën is voor hun eten afhankelijk van insecten.

    Bronnen: The Guardian, Welingelichte Kringen, 11-02-19
    https://www.welingelichtekringen.nl/natuur-en-milieu/890736/wetenschappers-waarschuwen-massale-insectensterfte-catastrofaal-voor-mens-en-dier.html

  • Les points d’eau doivent être protégés de l’usage des pesticides!

    Selon France Nature Environnement, de nombreux cours d’eau et les points d’eau comme les mares, étangs, zones humides ne figurent pas dans la liste des zones à protéger ! De plus, selon FNE, les préfectures ont également ignoré les périmètres de protection de captage d’eau potable. FNE de notre Région estimant que cette définition est bien trop restrictive pour permettre une bonne protection de la ressource en eau contre les pollutions par les pesticides a alerté le Préfet de région et les préfets de département. Sans réponse de l’administration, FNE a dû attaquer les arrêtés dans six départements (01, 07, 38, 42, 69, 74).

    Le juge du Tribunal administratif de Lyon a donné raison à FNE,pour les 4 départements qui relevaient de sa compétence (01, 07, 42, 69). Le motif invoqué est que l’arrêté « ne couvre pas l’ensemble des points d’eau et des éléments du réseau hydrographique visés par l’arrêté interministériel du 4 mai 2017 »

    Une mobilisation citoyenne contre les pesticides:

    Cette décision fait écho aux préoccupations des citoyens qui se mobilisent désormais pour saisir le politique. L’appel « Nous voulons des coquelicots » compte aujourd’hui plus de 930 000 signataires et augmente chaque semaine de 20 000 nouveaux pétitionnaires.

    Les maires de plus de 80 communes de France ont entendu cet appel et ont pris des arrêtés pour créer un cordon de sécurité de 150 m sans pesticide autour des habitations ou interdire complètement l’usage des pesticides dans leur ville. C’est un acte courageux et salutaire qui adresse un signal fort au gouvernement.

    De ce fait, FNE s’adresse de nouveau à Mr Pascal Mailhos, Préfet de notre région, pour qu’il entende la demande des citoyens et qu’il ordonne aux préfets de département, de protéger tous les milieux naturels qui alimentent les rivières et les nappes phréatiques pour garantir une eau potable sans pesticide, pour tous.

    Source: Commune Passion, octobre 27, 2019

    Les points d’eau doivent être protégés de l’usage des pesticides!

  • Bayer, Bauern und die Bienen: “ZDFzoom” über Insektizide

    In der Landwirtschaft sind Insektengifte nicht immer zu vermeiden. Manche Substanzen wie die Neonicotinoide beseitigen allerdings nicht nur Schädlinge, sondern schädigen auch Bienen. Der Bayer-Konzern, einer der Hersteller, gerät unter Druck: “ZDFzoom”-Recherchen haben ergeben, dass manche Giftstoffe längst hätten verboten werden müssen. Auch die Übernahme von Monsanto und Schadenersatzklagen in Sachen Glyphosat haben dem Konzern zugesetzt. Am Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2019, 22.45 Uhr, berichtet “ZDFzoom” über “BAYER, Bauern und die Bienen – Ein Konzern unter Druck”. Bereits am Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2019, 15.00 Uhr im ZDF und ab 11.00 Uhr in der ZDFmediathek, nimmt “planet e.” die Neonicotinoide in den Blick – in “Bioschutz statt Ackergift – Wie Würmer unsere Ernten retten”.

    Dass das massenhafte Bienensterben auf die Wirkung der Neonicotinoide zurückzuführen ist – zu diesem Ergebnis kommen Wissenschaftler aus aller Welt. Die “ZDFzoom”-Recherchen haben ergeben: Einige Giftstoffe hätten längst verboten werden müssen. Der Bayer-Konzern hat jahrelang Kritiker und Wissenschaftler unter Druck gesetzt.

    Seit mehr als 20 Jahren warnen Wissenschaftler und Studien vor den negativen Auswirkungen der Neonicotionoiden. Hat die Industrie mithilfe der Behörden ein Verbot der Stoffe über Jahre verschleppt?

    Studien belegen, dass Neonicotinoide nicht nur Schädlinge, sondern auch Bienen und andere Nutztiere töten. Der Niederländer Henk Tennekes forscht seit Jahren über die Gifte. Sein Resümee: Noch nie gab es ein gefährlicheres Insektizid. Dabei hat er auch eine Bayer-Studie von 1991 entdeckt, die zum Ergebnis kam, dass ein Neonicotinoid negativ auf die Nervenzellen einer Fliegenart wirkt. Diese seien “irreversibel”, also unumkehrbar. Tennekes hat den Konzern mit seinen Erkenntnissen konfrontiert: “Bayer behauptet jetzt, dass die Rezeptorenbindung reversibel, also umkehrbar ist. Sie widersprechen sich also. Wenn sie sich überlegt hätten, welche Folgen diese Substanz hat, hätten sie diese Substanz vom Markt nehmen müssen.”

    Auch in Frankreich hatten Wissenschaftler das Bienensterben analysiert und ein Insektizid als Ursache benannt, das ebenfalls von Bayer stammt. Der Konzern aber wollte die Ergebnisse nicht publizieren, berichtet der Toxikologe Jean-Marc Bonmatin. In Japan stellten Toxikologen fest, dass die Neonicotinoide auch auf andere Lebewesen wirken, wie Fische und Flusskrebse. Auch dort wollte Bayer verhindern, dass Wissenschaftler die Ergebnisse publizieren “ZDFzoom” hat den Bayer-Konzern mit den Recherchen und Vorwürfen konfrontiert, ein Interview vor der Kamera wurde abgelehnt.

    Quelle: ZDF Preseportal, 27.10.19
    https://www.presseportal.de/pm/7840/4415716

  • Canada’s Bats Face Growing Threat

    Hibernating bats may be storing pesticides from contaminated insect food in their flesh over winter, lowering their immune systems and putting them at greater risk of disease and death, says the Canadian Wildlife Federation (CWF).

    “Many Canadians have heard our distress signal about the harmful effects of neonicotinoids (neonics) on pollinating species and are joining CWF in calling for national monitoring and habitat recovery programs for butterflies, wild bees and other pollinators, but Canada’s bats may also be impacted and need our attention too,” said Carolyn Callaghan, senior conservation biologist, terrestrial wildlife.

    Bat populations are already in steep decline and this new threat impacts an already fragile population. “More research is needed to understand how these pesticides impact bats and what can be done to reduce the threat. We also need to rethink how we are producing our food and build environmental sustainability into agricultural systems. Bats are important allies to food production because they are effective predators of crop pests. Keeping them safe from impacts of modern agricultural practices will also benefit farmers.”

    Researchers are learning that neonics can harm bats by reducing the insect food supply. Bats go into a state of hibernation called torpor during the winter and unless they have accumulated enough body fat by autumn their chances of surviving the winter is reduced. Bats are also impacted by consuming insects that have been exposed to neonics. Research has demonstrated that neonics can impair a bat’s ability to use echolocation and to perform intricate flying maneuvers, which is critical to successfully capturing prey. Researchers have also discovered that bats can actually retain neonics in their systems over time, Callaghan said. Neonics were detected in the tissue of bats collected during the winter in the Northeastern United States. Neonics have also been shown to disrupt topor.

    Source: GLOBE NEWSWIRE, Oct. 24, 2019
    https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/10/24/1935239/0/en/Canada-s-Bats-Face-Growing-Threat.html

  • Chemicals in consumer products linked to lower IQs in children

    Researchers found that exposure to certain chemicals in consumer products during the first trimester of pregnancy is linked to lower IQ in children by age 7. Among the first of its kind, the study, carried out by scientists from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Karlstad University, Sweden, linked mixtures of suspected endocrine-disrupting chemicals to prenatal neurodevelopment.

    The research analyzed data from SELMA, a study of Swedish mothers and children during the first trimester of pregnancy, measuring 26 chemicals in the blood and urine of 718 mothers. The chemicals included bisphenol A (BPA), commonly found in plastic food and drink containers, as well as pesticides, phthalates, and others. Some of the 26 are established to affect the endocrine (hormone) activity while others are suspected to do so.

    The scientists revisited the families when children reached age 7, finding that the kids whose mothers had greater amounts of chemicals in their system while pregnant exhibited lower IQ scores. This particularly affected boys, whose scores were two points lower. From all the chemicals, the greatest contribution to lower IQ was found to be from the compound bisphenol F (BPF), a BPA-replacement.

    Other potentially harmful chemicals included the pesticide chloropyrifos, polyfluoroalkyl substances from cleaning products, triclosan, found in antibacterial soaps, soft polyvinyl chloride plastics and phthalates, which are used in cosmetics as well as numerous other products like soaps, nail polish, hairspray, shower curtains, raincoats, car interiors and even dryer sheets, as reported Scientific American.

    Many of the chemicals only stay in the body for a short period of time, indicating that even being exposed to them briefly can have a negative effect. Previous studies linked endocrine disruptors to neurodevelopmental issues in children.

    Eva Tanner, PhD, MPH, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, put their study in perspective —

    “This study is significant because most studies evaluate one chemical at a time; however, humans are exposed to many chemicals at the same time, and multiple exposures may be harmful even when each individual chemical is at a low level,” said Tanner.

    Source: Daily Times, 26 Oct 2019

    Chemicals in consumer products linked to lower IQs in children

  • Het oppervlaktewater in Nederland is extreem verontreinigd met bestrijdingsmiddelen

    De waterkwaliteit krijgt in Nederland een dikke onvoldoende, blijkt uit onderzoek. Ook de drinkwatervoorziening loopt gevaar. Nederland zal daardoor waarschijnlijk niet op tijd voldoen aan de Europese Kaderrichtlijn Water. De kans bestaat de Europese Commissie boetes zal opleggen. Dit zegt duurzaamheidsorganisatie Natuur & Milieu in een rapport dat vandaag verschijnt.

    Bestrijdingsmiddelen, die onder meer in de bollenteelt veelvuldig worden toegepast, worden volop gevonden in meetputten van het landelijke meetnet, dat onder meer door de waterschappen wordt beheerd. De laatste jaren worden bij zes op de tien meetpunten overschrijdingen van de maximumnorm voor bestrijdingsmiddelen vastgesteld.

    ‘Vooral in gebieden met glastuinbouw, bloemkwekerijen, bollenteelt en vollegronds groenteteelt’, aldus het rapport. Over vier jaar moeten deze overschrijdingen tot nul zijn teruggebracht. ‘Er is nog een lange weg te gaan.’ Volgens de deskundigen die Natuur & Milieu sprak zal Nederland die eis niet op tijd halen.

    Door de slechte waterkwaliteit loopt ook de drinkwatervoorziening gevaar. In de afgelopen jaren zijn meer dan twintig waterwinputten in Oost- en Zuid-Nederland gesloten.

    In het rapport wordt opgemerkt dat het totale gebruik van bestrijdingsmiddelen tussen 2012 en 2016 weliswaar per hectare licht is gedaald (met 3,5 procent), maar de daling komt doordat er 5 procent minder grond voor de landbouw wordt gebruikt: ‘Er worden dus per hec­tare juist meer bestrijdingsmiddelen gebruikt’. Mede door het grote areaal sierteelt (vooral voor de export) heeft Nederland het hoogste gebruik van middelen in Europa: bijna negen kilo per hectare. In Denemarken ligt dat op één kilo per hectare.

    Bron: Trouw, 07-03-19
    https://www.trouw.nl/duurzaamheid-natuur/het-oppervlaktewater-in-nederland-is-veel-smeriger-dan-gedacht~be94910c/

  • A flap over barn swallows raises larger concerns about a bird in decline

    The swallows are among a species of bird known as aerial insectivores, which feed on insects while flying. Their numbers have dwindled in recent decades, which ornithologists attribute to increased use of pesticides. In New England, barn swallows have declined by more than 50 percent since the 1980s, ornithologists say.

    Source: The Boston Globe, May 11, 2019
    https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/05/11/flap-over-barn-swallows-raises-larger-concerns-about-bird-decline/iJpekuqpWejXVG5rCLfvCL/story.html

  • Minister Schouten: gifvrije zones rond landbouw is juridisch niet haalbaar

    Er komen geen spuitvrije zones in bewoonde gebieden bij bollenvelden of in de buurt van andere akkers waar met gif gespoten wordt. Dat heeft minister Schouten laten weten in een brief aan de Kamer. Volgens de minister is zo’n spuitvrije zone juridisch niet haalbaar. “Ik ben opnieuw oprecht teleurgesteld en ik wist niet dat dat nog kon”, zegt Rodina Fournell van Stichting Bolleboos; een groep burgers die al jaren strijdt tegen het gebruik van bestrijdingsmiddelen in de lelieteelt.

    De Kamer had van de minister geëist dat ze omwonenden van bollenvelden zou beschermen tegen bestrijdingsmiddelen door spuitvrije zones in te stellen. Maar de Kamer heeft pech, blijkt uit de brief van Schouten. Die brief valt Fournell zwaar tegen: “Wat ze doet is de huidige situatie presenteren als een nieuw idee, iets wat eigenlijk al de praktijk is. Ze zegt eigenlijk: ‘mensen zoek het lekker zelf uit’.”

    Deskundigen pleitten eerder in ZEMBLA ook al voor spuitvrije zones in de buurt van jonge gezinnen. Dat deden ze naar aanleiding van het zogeheten blootstellingsonderzoek van het RIVM.

    Bron: Zembla, 18-10-19
    https://www.bnnvara.nl/zembla/artikelen/minister-schouten-geen-gifvrije-zones-rond-landbouw-want-juridisch-niet-haalbaar

  • Europarlementariërs blokkeren afzwakking bijenbescherming door lidstaten

    Europarlementariërs sturen de Commissie terug naar de tekentafel nadat de lidstaten de voorgestelde maatregelen voor de bescherming van bijen hadden afgezwakt. Het ontwerpvoorstel van de Europese Commissie was bedoeld om de aanbevelingen van de Europese Voedselautoriteit (EFSA) uit 2013 op te nemen in EU-wetgeving. De EFSA adviseerde om het gebruik van bestrijdingsmiddelen die schadelijk zijn voor bijen te verminderen. In de aanbevelingen staat hoe bestrijdingsmiddelen getest dienen te worden om bijen tegen acute en langdurige blootstelling te beschermen. De bestrijdingsmiddelen blijven op de markt, maar alleen als zij deze nieuwe testen doorstaan.

    Een groot deel van de EU-lidstaten is echter tegen deze maatregelen. De Commissie is hierdoor genoodzaakt om enkel de maatregelen die bijen tegen acute blootstelling beschermen te behouden. “Het is onaanvaardbaar dat lidstaten de volledige uitvoering van het bijenadvies van EFSA uit 2013 blokkeren”, zegt het Europees Parlement in een resolutie die woensdag is aangenomen. Het Commissievoorstel “komt alleen met aanpassingen (…) tegen acute giftigheid voor honingbijen, maar zwijgt over langdurige giftigheid voor honingbijen, hommels en wilde bijen.” Bovendien strookt het voorstel van de Commissie “niet met recente wetenschappelijke en technologische ontwikkelingen” en “verandert het niveau van bescherming niet”, stelt het Parlement in de resolutie.

    De Europarlementariërs benadrukken dat de Europese Commissie niet mag zwichten voor 16 lidstaten die de beschermingscriteria tegenhouden, aangezien zij samen geen gekwalificeerde meerderheid vormen.

    De resolutie roept de Commissie op om met nieuwe wetgeving te komen op basis van de laatste wetenschappelijke en technologische kennis. “Door veel te lage evaluatiecriteria voor het gevaar van bestrijdingsmiddelen voor bijen te verwerpen willen we antwoord op een simpele vraag: zijn we serieus over milieubescherming? Zijn we serieus over de bescherming van levende organismen? Zijn we serieus over een Green Deal?” zegt de voorzitter van de Milieucommissie Pascal Canfin (Renew, FR). Hij voegt hieraan toe: “De resultaten zijn duidelijk: dankzij onze actie heeft een grote meerderheid van het Europees Parlement zich tegen afgezwakte wetgeving voor de bescherming van bijen gekeerd. We vragen de Commissie nu om hun voorstel te herzien en ons wetgeving voor te leggen die de gevaarlijkste bestrijdingsmiddelen voor bestuivers verbiedt.”

    Bron: FOK, 24-10-19
    https://frontpage.fok.nl/nieuws/824028/1/1/50/europarlementariers-blokkeren-afzwakking-bijenbescherming-door-lidstaten.html